MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Optimized Structures and Theoretical <sup>1</sup>H-NMR Spectral Analysis of the Methylene Protons in Dibenzyl Sulfoxide

2011· article· en· W2042117221 on OpenAlexaff
Zheng Ping Wu, Yuan Bing Sun, Ian S. Butler

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvanced materials research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMolecular spectroscopy and chirality
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMethyleneSolventSulfoxideChemistryDimethyl sulfoxideProton NMRChemical shiftDensity functional theorySolvent effectsNMR spectra databaseBond lengthCrystallographyComputational chemistryPhysical chemistrySpectral lineStereochemistryMedicinal chemistryOrganic chemistryCrystal structurePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dibenzyl sulfoxide [C6H5CH2)2SO, DBzSO] has been studied using density functional theory (DFT) methods with a particular emphasis on the theoretical 1H-NMR spectra of the methylene protons. The 1H-NMR chemical shifts of the methylene protons of DBzSO can be divided into two main types. Four possible structures of DBzSO were considered and the total energies were calculated for both a vacuum and in CDCl3 solvent. The change of length of S-O and S-C bonds in solvent was more obvious than that of the C(CH2)-C(C6H5) bonds; The S-O bond was longer and S-C bond was shorter in CDCl3. The essence effect of solvent on the properties of dibenzyl sulfoxide should come from the change of the geometrical structure. The change of shift Δx, [shift (solvent) - shift (vacuum)] showed that the effect of solvent on methylene protons of dibenzyl sulfoxide was apparent. Except of the other H of the rings, the two ortho H which were near S-O bond appeared more sensitivity on the solvent. The optimized structures in CDCl3 were in good agreement with the experimental data. The NMR peaks of methylene protons should be split more apparently in actual circumstance and the complex split of CH2 1HNMR peaks should be explained in some degree.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.038
Threshold uncertainty score0.995

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.339
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvanced materials researchSame topicMolecular spectroscopy and chiralityFrench-language works237,207