Stored Ca2+ Depletion-induced Oligomerization of Stromal Interaction Molecule 1 (STIM1) via the EF-SAM Region
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Stromal interaction molecule 1 (STIM1) has recently been identified as a key player in store-operated Ca2+ entry. Endoplasmic reticulum (ER) luminal Ca2+ depletion results in STIM1 redistribution from ER membrane homogeneity to distinctly localized aggregates near the plasma membrane; these changes precede and are linked to cytoplasmic Ca2+ influx via Ca2+ release-activated channels (CRACs). The molecular mechanisms initiating ER STIM1 redistribution and plasma membrane CRAC activity are not well understood. We recombinantly expressed the Ca2+-sensing region of STIM1 consisting of the EF-hand together with the sterile alpha-motif (SAM) domain (EF-SAM) to investigate its Ca2+-related conformational and biochemical features. We demonstrate that Ca2+-loaded EF-SAM (holo) contains high alpha-helicity, whereas EF-SAM in the absence of Ca2+ (apo) is much less compact. Accordingly, the melting temperature (Tm) of the holoform is approximately 25 degrees C higher than apoform; heat and urea-derived thermodynamic parameters indicate a Ca2+-induced stabilization of 3.2 kcal mol(-1). We show that holoEF-SAM exists as a monomer, whereas apoEF-SAM readily forms a dimer and/or oligomer, and that oligomer to monomer transitions and vice versa are at least in part mediated by changes in surface hydrophobicity. Additionally, we find that the Ca2+ binding affinity of EF-SAM is relatively low with an apparent dissociation constant (Kd) of approximately 0.2-0.6 mM and a binding stoichiometry of 1. Our results suggest that EF-SAM actively participates in and is the likely the molecular trigger initiating STIM1 punctae formation via large conformational changes. The low Ca2+ affinity of EF-SAM is reconciled with the confirmed role of STIM1 as an ER Ca2+ sensor.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".