The serotonin transporter polymorphisms and major depression following traumatic brain injury
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the role of the serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms on the risk of major depression following traumatic brain injury (TBI). METHODS: Seventy-five patients who had sustained a TBI and who met the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (4th ed) (DSM-IV) criteria for mood disorder due to TBI were compared to 99 controls with TBI but no mood disorder. The severity of depression was rated using the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD) for the depressed patients. All patients were genotyped for the serotonin transporter gene-linked polymorphic region (5-HTTLPR) with the assay for the rs25531 allelic variant. RESULTS: The distribution of genotype frequencies was not different between the depressed and control groups (chi(2) = 1.43, df = 2, p = 0.488) and for the depressed patients there was no association between HAMD scores and the polymorphisms (t-test = 1.71, df = 68, p = 0.092). CONCLUSION: There was no evidence of association between the serotonin transporter gene polymorphisms and depression post-TBI. Future research is indicated into the possible role of other candidate genes as risk factors for depression in this population.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".