MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042248937 · doi:10.1117/12.476661

Birefringence compensation in silicon-on-insulator planar waveguide demultiplexers using a buried oxide layer

2003· article· en· W2042248937 on OpenAlexaff
Pavel Cheben, Dan‐Xia Xu, Siegfried Janz, A. Delâge, Dan Dalacu

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsInstitute for Microstructural Sciences
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSilicon on insulatorMaterials scienceOpticsBirefringenceGratingWaveguidePlanarOptoelectronicsPolarization (electrochemistry)Insertion lossWavelengthSiliconRefractive indexDemultiplexerPhysicsElectronic engineeringMultiplexerMultiplexing

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The high index contrast of silicon-on-insulator (SOI) enables the scaling down of planar waveguide components into the microphotonic regime, but has the unwanted consequence of inducing a large TE-TM polarization birefringence. For ridge waveguides this birefringence can be reduced to an acceptable level by using appropriate ridge dimensions [1], but with decreasing Si thickness the required fabrication tolerances quickly become too narrow to implement this solution. Components with slab waveguide regions such as echelle grating demultiplexers cannot be made polarization independent using this method. An alternate approach is to introduce a polarization compensation region in the combiner section of an AWG or echelle grating to eliminate the polarization dependent wavelength shift[2]. In its original implementation, the compensator is fabricated by changing the local waveguide thickness. The resulting birefringence correction can be sensitive to errors in etch depth, and the mode mismatch between compensator and slab waveguide sections is a source of approximately 1 dB extra insertion loss (IL) for SOI demultiplexers with Si waveguide thickness in the range from 2 to 5 m. We describe a new compensator structure for the SOI platform using a buried low index layer, in this case SiO2 sandwiched between the Si waveguide layer and another Si cap layer. Such a silicon-oxide-silicon (SOS) compensator on SOI can eliminate the TE-TM wavelength shift of an SOI AWG or echelle grating demultiplexer without introducing a significant mode mismatch between the compensator and slab waveguide sections. A demultiplexer with an SOS compensator has almost 1 dB lower insertion loss of an equivalent device with an etched compensator. The SOS compensator is easily implemented using standard oxide and a-Si or polysilicon deposition techniques. In this paper we present calculations and experimental results on the effective birefringence compensation, PDL and IL of SOS compensators in SOI waveguide demultiplexers.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.532
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.218 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicPhotonic and Optical DevicesFrench-language works237,207