Evaluation of interactions between Rhynchosporium secalis and Pyrenophora teres on barley
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Interactions between Rhynchosporiumsecalis and Pyrenophora teres were investigated on barley (Hordeum vulgare) seedlings grown in a greenhouse and growth chambers. Following mixed inoculations, the two pathogens colonized the same leaf simultaneously, but the leaf area with symptoms (LAS) was less than that produced by either of the two pathogens alone at the same inoculum concentration. On plants inoculated with the mixed inocula, LAS induced by R. secalis was reduced by a greater amount than LAS induced by P. teres. The predominance of P. teres over R. secaliswas observed even when inoculations with R. secalis either preceded or followed the inoculation with P. teres by 24 h. Antagonism occurred when inoculum densities were 103-104 spores mL-1 for each pathogen, wetting periods were 24-28 h, and incubation temperature was above 12°C.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".