MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042279565 · doi:10.2118/98398-ms

A New Technical Standard for Testing of Heavy Brines

2006· article· en· W2042279565 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueSPE International Symposium and Exhibition on Formation Damage Control · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsNalco (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBrineCorrosionCrystallizationPetroleum engineeringEnvironmental scienceSpecific gravityPour pointParticulatesMetallurgyMaterials scienceEngineeringMineralogyChemistryChemical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract A new technical standard has been developed for assessing the performance and physical characteristics of heavy brines used in completion, packer, and drill-in operations. This technical standard includes procedures for evaluating the density, specific gravity, clarity, amount of suspended particulate matter, crystallization point, pH, and iron contamination. It also contains a discussion of gas hydrate formation and mitigation, brine viscosity,brine crystallization at high pressures,corrosion testing, buffering capacity,and a standardized reporting form.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.965
Threshold uncertainty score0.431

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.205
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it