MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042344440 · doi:10.1002/bip.10154

Effects of lipids on elastin's viscoelastic properties

2002· article· en· W2042344440 on OpenAlexaff
M. A. Lillie, John M. Gosline

Bibliographic record

VenueBiopolymers · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicConnective tissue disorders research
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElastinChemistryViscoelasticitySwellingSodium dodecyl sulfateBiophysicsBiochemistryChemical engineeringComposite materialMaterials science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) was used as a model lipid to identify the molecular basis of possible lipid-induced changes in the viscoelastic behavior of arterial elastin. The chemical composition of the elastin network and the interfibrillar space was calculated from the chemical content of the elastin sample and its swelling behavior. Viscoelastic behavior was measured in aqueous SDS and in SDS plus 1 M sucrose, a deswelling agent. Viscoelastic behavior was also measured in sucrose and potassium thiocyanate solutions to identify the effects of swelling and of changes in network composition exclusive of any direct SDS effects. The hydration of the elastin network decreased at low SDS levels and increased at higher SDS levels. The elastin was stiffer in the dehydrated network and less stiff in the hydrated network. However, once the degree of hydration exceeded that of elastin in pure water, no further decrease in stiffness was obtained despite continued increase in swelling. The stiffness of the network could be accounted for entirely by changes in network hydration. There was no evidence that SDS had any effect on elastin's conformation. We predict that arterial lipids will interact with elastin in a similar way and will have only small effects on elastin's viscoelastic behavior.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.423

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.235
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBiopolymersSame topicConnective tissue disorders researchFrench-language works237,207