Small-Dose Pentobarbital Enhances Synaptic Transmission in Rat Hippocampus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
UNLABELLED: We investigated the contribution of bicarbonate ion, gamma-aminobutyric acid-A (GABA(A)) receptors, and N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptors to pentobarbital-induced enhancement of excitatory synaptic transmission in the hippocampal slice. Transverse hippocampal slices (400 microm thick) were prepared from 20- to 30-day-old Sprague-Dawley rats and maintained in an interface chamber perfused with warmed (35 degrees C) oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Extracellular field potentials, evoked by orthodromic paired-pulse stimulation of the Schaffer collateral CA1 pathway, were analyzed for the population spike (PS) amplitude. Pentobarbital had a concentration-dependent, biphasic effect on PS amplitudes, which were increased approximately twofold (P < 0.001) when the slice was exposed to pentobarbital concentrations of 1 and 5 microM and depressed at drug concentrations larger than 10 microM. Pentobarbital (5 microM) did not increase the PS amplitude when stimulation was stopped during exposure to the drug. The enhancement of PS amplitude was suppressed in the presence of 10 microM acetazolamide, a nonselective carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, and when the slice was bathed in CO(2)/HCO(3)(-)-free artificial cerebrospinal fluid. Pretreatment with 1 microM picrotoxin, a GABA(A) receptor antagonist, or 5 microM 2-amino-5-phosphopentanoic acid, a specific NMDA receptor antagonist, also suppressed enhancement of PS amplitude by 5 microM pentobarbital. The results suggest that small concentrations of pentobarbital (1 and 5 microM) enhance synaptic transmission through mechanisms involving GABA(A) and NMDA receptors and the HCO(3)(-) ion. IMPLICATIONS: Enhanced hippocampal synaptic transmission after exposure to subanesthetic concentrations of pentobarbital persists during drug washout. This finding may help to explain why some patients experience excitation and enhanced pain during emergence from anesthesia.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".