MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042393249 · doi:10.1117/12.713112

Web-based collaborative decision support services for river runoff and flood risk prediction in the Oak Ridge Moraine Area, Canada

2006· article· en· W2042393249 on OpenAlexaffabout
Lei Wang, Qiuming Cheng

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicGeographic Information Systems Studies
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFlood mythDecision support systemMetadataComputer scienceSurface runoffWeb serviceData sharingData miningWorld Wide WebGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

River runoff is highly related to the precipitation events and the land use characteristics. It is an important component in the hydrologic cycle because of its relationship to issues such as flood and water quantity. The Oak Ridge Moraine (ORM) Area, Southern Ontario has always been faced with the impacts of extreme hydrological events. Flood not only has an impact on the ORM economical, social well-being and particularly public safety, but also exacerbates major environmental problems. Prediction of flood is a complex system of which involves variable factors including climate condition, basin attributes, land use/cover types and ground water discharge. The application of flood prediction model requires the efficient management of large spatial and temporal datasets, which involves data acquisition, storage, and processing, as well as manipulation, reporting and display results. The complexity of flood prediction makes it difficult for individual organization to deal effectively with decision-making. Difficulty in linking data, analysis tools and models across organization is one of the barriers to be overcome in developing integrated river runoff and flood risks prediction system. Therefore, it is required to develop a standardized framework for Web-based Collaborative Decision Support Services (WCDSS), supporting information exchange and knowledge and model sharing from different organizations on the web. Such a WCDSS supply both metadata services, geo-data services and geo-processing services to help collaborative decision-making, not only support distributed data sharing and services, but also support distributed model sharing and services. This paper develop a WCDSS that provides a comprehensive environment for on-line river runoff and flood risk prediction, integrating information retrieval, analysis and model analysis for information sharing and decision-making support. Such a SDSS will improve understanding of the environmental, planning and management issues and emergency management and response associated with the ORM's water environment, and to develop sustainable solutions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.802
Threshold uncertainty score0.992

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIESame topicGeographic Information Systems StudiesFrench-language works237,207