MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042417018 · doi:10.1021/ac034934s

Combining Liquid Chromatography with MALDI Mass Spectrometry Using a Heated Droplet Interface

2004· article· en· W2042417018 on OpenAlexafffund
Boyan Zhang, Chris McDonald, Liang Li

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMass Spectrometry Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsChemistryChromatographyMass spectrometryAnalytical Chemistry (journal)Boiling pointEvaporationTransfer lineVolumetric flow rateMass transferAnalyteSample preparationSolvent

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A novel interfacing technology is described to combine solution-based separation techniques such as liquid chromatography (LC) with matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization (MALDI) mass spectrometry. The interface includes a transfer tube having an inlet and an outlet, the inlet being adapted to accept the LC effluents and the outlet being adapted to form continuously replaced, hanging droplets of the liquid stream, and a MALDI sample plate mounted below the outlet of the transfer tube for collecting the droplets. The liquid stream in the transfer tube is heated to a temperature sufficient to cause partial evaporation of the carrier solvent from the hanging droplets. The droplets are dislodged to the MALDI plate, which is heated to above the boiling point of the carrier solvent to cause further evaporation of the carrier solvent from the collected droplets. It is found that analytes can be fractionated and deposited to a sample spot of 0.8 mm in diameter when a liquid flow rate of up to 50 microL/min and a fractionation interval of 1 min/spot are used. Flow rate of up to 200 microL/min can be used with a deposition sample spot of 2.4 mm in diameter on a commercial MALDI target. This heated droplet interface does not introduce sample loss, and the detection sensitivity of LC/MALDI is similar to that of standard MALDI, i.e., low femtomoles for peptide analysis with a microliter sample deposition. It is compatible with microbore and narrow-bore column separation, thus allowing the injection of a larger amount of sample for separation and analysis, compared to a capillary column LC/MALDI system. The detection dynamic range is shown to be in the order of 10(6) for peptide mixture analysis, which is 4 orders of magnitude greater than standard MALDI. The application of this interface for combining LC with MALDI MS/MS is demonstrated in the proteome analysis of water-soluable protein components of E. coli K12 extracts.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.266
Teacher spread0.254 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicMass Spectrometry Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207