A Canine Model for the Study of Hapten-Specific Suppression of IgE-Mediated Bronchoconstriction and Anaphylaxis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Newborn mongrel dogs were sensitized with conjugates of ovalbumin (OA) and 2,4-dinitrophenol (OA-DNP3) in the presence of Al(OH)3 to produce high levels of anti-OA and anti-DNP IgE antibody. At 4-6 months of age, when anti-DNP and anti-OA antibody levels reached titers of 64 by passive cutaneous anaphylaxis, the dogs underwent separate inhalation and intravenous challenges with conjugates of DNP and bovine gamma globulin (DNP15-BGG) and OA. Inhalation challenge with DNP15-BGG and OA resulted in 5- and 10-fold increases in airflow resistance, respectively. Intravenous challenge with either DNP15-BGG or OA produced profound anaphylaxis with 60-80% decreases in blood pressure, cardiac output and regional blood flows in the carotid, superior mesenteric and renal arteries, and the distal aorta. Treatment of sensitized dogs with 5 doses of 20 mg of conjugates of DNP and polyvinyl alcohol (DNP2-PVA) on alternate days resulted in suppression of anti-DNP IgE antibody production; abrogation of established airway and vascular anaphylactic sensitivities; no change in regional blood flows, and no effect on sensitivities to challenge with OA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".