Pathogenicity of the hymenolepidid cestode<i>Microsomacanthus hopkinsi</i>in its intermediate host,<i>Hyalella azteca</i>: implications for transmission, host fitness, and host populations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Infection by larval parasites can have severe consequences on intermediate hosts that affect transmission, fecundity and fitness of the host, and host population structure. This study examines the pathogenic effects of cysticercoid larvae of the hymenolepidid cestode Microsomacanthus hopkinsi (Schiller, 1951) on its amphipod intermediate host, Hyalella azteca Saussure, 1858. There was a significant, positive relationship between oncosphere consumption, cysticercoid burden, and age in short-term experiments in which groups of H. azteca were exposed individually to single egg packets of M. hopkinsi during instars 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 9; however, there was no correlation between oncosphere consumption and the intensity of infection in the amphipod hosts within each instar. The mean number of moults over a 14 day experimental period was significantly less in infected amphipods than in their respective controls. In short-term experiments, the greatest mortality appeared to be limited to amphipods exposed during the earliest instars; little mortality was observed in amphipods exposed during instar 4 or later. Long-term experiments revealed a significant negative effect of infection on the overall life span of both male and female H. azteca exposed individually to a single egg packet during instar 4. Of 72 females infected during instar 4 and provided with mates during instar 6, only 1 and 4 produced broods in instars 8 and 9, respectively, compared with 58 and 57 of 72 control females. Broods produced by infected females were significantly smaller than those of control females. Infected individuals were less likely to mate successfully. The results are discussed in terms of their consequences for transmission, host fitness, and potential effects on host populations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".