Modulation of Voltage-Gated Ion Channels in Rat Retinal Ganglion Cells Mediated by Somatostatin Receptor Subtype 4
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Somatostatin (somatotropin release-inhibiting factor [SRIF]) is known to modulate the excitability of retinal ganglion cells, but the membrane mechanisms responsible and the extent to which intracellular calcium signaling is affected have not been determined. We show that somatostatin receptor subtype 4 (sst(4)) is expressed specifically in rat ganglion cells and that the generation of repetitive action potentials by isolated ganglion cells is reduced in the presence of L-803,087, a selective sst(4) agonist (10 nM). Under voltage clamp, L-803,087 increased outward K(+) currents by 51.1 ± 13.1% at 0 mV and suppressed Ca(2+) channel currents by 32.5 ± 9.4% at -10 mV in whole cell patch-clamped ganglion cells. The N-type Ca(2+) channel blocker ω-conotoxin GVIA (CTX, 1 μM) reduced L-type Ca(2+) current (I(Ca)) in ganglion cells by 43.5 ± 7.2% at -10 mV, after which addition of L-803,087 further reduced I(Ca) by 28.0 ± 16.0% . In contrast, ganglion cells treated first with nifedipine (NIF, 10 μM), which blocked 46.1 ± 3.5% of the control current at -10 mV, did not undergo any further reduction in I(Ca) in the presence of L-803,087 (-3.5 ± 3.8% vs. NIF), showing that stimulation of sst(4) reduces Ca(2+) influx through L-type Ca(2+) channels. To assess the effects of sst(4) stimulation on intracellular Ca(2+) levels ([Ca(2+)](i)) in ganglion cells, fura-2 was used to measure changes in [Ca(2+)](i) in response to depolarization induced by elevated [K(+)](o). [Ca(2+)](i) was increased to a lesser extent (86%) in the presence of L-803,087 compared with recordings made in the absence of the sst(4) agonist and this effect was blocked by NIF (10 μM). Suppression of spiking and Ca(2+) signaling via sst(4) may contribute to the reported neuroprotective actions of somatostatin and promote ganglion cell survival following ischemia and axonal trauma.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".