MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042537893 · doi:10.1071/fp04190

Identification of a SAR8.2 gene in the susceptible host response of Nicotiana benthamiana to Colletotrichum orbiculare

2005· article· en· W2042537893 on OpenAlexaff
X. C. Shan, Paul H. Goodwin

Bibliographic record

VenueFunctional Plant Biology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Virus Research Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNicotiana benthamianaBiologyHost (biology)Identification (biology)BotanyGeneColletotrichumNicotianaMicrobiologyGeneticsSolanaceae

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A SAR8.2 gene, NbSAR8.2m, was obtained from a PCR-selected cDNA subtraction library constructed from mRNA of Nicotiana benthamiana Domin. infected with Colletotrichum orbiculare (Berk & Mont.) von Arx. It is the first SAR8.2 gene described from N. benthamiana and shows relatively high similarity in both the coding and 3'-UTR to NtSAR8.2m of Nicotiana tabacum L. Expression of NbSAR8.2m occurred in healthy plants but was induced 8-fold following infection by C. orbiculare. Virus-induced gene silencing of NbSAR8.2m reduced its expression and resulted in the development of disease symptoms 24 h earlier than in control plants, indicating that NbSAR8.2m affects the length of the biotrophic phase of infection. Both NtSAR8.2m and NbSAR8.2m are unique among the SAR8.2 genes in that they encode for four cysteines near the C-terminus. The conserved cysteines of SAR8.2 genes may indicate roles in stress responses, defence reactions, metal ion homeostasis or other processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFunctional Plant BiologySame topicPlant Virus Research StudiesFrench-language works237,207