Paraspermatogenesis inCeratostoma foliatum (Neogastropoda): confirmation of programmed nuclear death
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sperm dimorphism, where ejaculates contain both fertile "eusperm" and sterile "parasperm", has been implicated in sperm competition in animals. Most parasperm lack an acrosome, eliminate the nucleus and develop a complex cytoplasm, swollen with secretory vesicles. This study of parasperm in the foliate whelk Ceratostoma foliatum, focuses on characterizing the process of nuclear breakdown and the nature of cytoplasmic secretions. Testis squash preparations were treated with a Promega apoptosis detection [terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase (TdT)-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling-TUNEL] assay (Cedar Lane) to detect nuclear apoptosis; acridine orange was used to localize lysosomes. Parasperm were isolated on Percoll gradients and their proteins characterized by running electrophoresis of lysed, purified fractions on polyacrylamide gels. Results show that the process of nuclear breakdown follows the hallmarks of apoptosis in ultrastructure, which is confirmed by the presence of 3'-OH overhangs of DNA fragments. This research implicates snail parasperm as models for elucidating the nuclear events of apoptosis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".