A Rare Case of Anaplastic Variant of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma Presenting as a Lung Primary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Primary pulmonary lymphoma is an uncommon neoplastic disorder representing approximately 0.5% to 1% of primary pulmonary malignancies. The vast majority are of low-grade, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue type. Primary diffuse large B-cell lymphoma of the lung is rare, though cases of the centroblastic and immunoblastic variants have been described. We present herein an interesting case of an 80-year-old man who presented with both respiratory and constitutional symptoms and was found to have a 4.5 cm left hilar mass with bilateral hilar and mediastinal lymphadenopathy on imaging. Endobronchial biopsy revealed an aggressive large cell lymphoma, with scattered large, bizarre-shaped nuclei resembling Reed-Sternberg cells, positive for CD20, PAX5, CD30, and MUM-1, consistent with an anaplastic variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Imaging showed no evidence of extrathoracic disease. Standard treatment with cyclophosphamide/vincristine/prednisone and rituximab resulted in significant clinical and radiological response and the patient remains in remission 21 months later. To the best of our knowledge, this modified Ann Arbor stage II2E primary pulmonary lymphoma, is the first description in the English literature of anaplastic variant of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma presenting as a lung primary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".