MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042607252 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2012.2226921

Battery-in-the-Loop Simulation of a Planetary-Gear-Based Hybrid Electric Vehicle

2013· article· en· W2042607252 on OpenAlexaff
Ehsan Tara, Shaahin Filizadeh, E. Dirks

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrivetrainBattery (electricity)Hardware-in-the-loop simulationTransient (computer programming)Electric vehicleAutomotive engineeringSimulationEngineeringModeling and simulationVehicle dynamicsReal-time simulationHybrid vehicleControl engineeringComputer scienceTorquePower (physics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper deals with the development of a hardware-in-the-loop (HIL) real-time simulation setup for vehicular systems. In modeling a vehicular drivetrain, the battery model poses the greatest challenge. Mathematical battery models suitable for real-time and transient simulation are often inaccurate due to internal electrochemical reactions in the battery and external factors such as loading conditions. To model these phenomena precisely while maintaining low computational intensity as required for real-time simulation is a prohibitively difficult task. In lieu of a mathematical model, this paper presents a simulation setup where actual batteries are interfaced with a real-time simulator. It provides a platform to test the emerging battery technologies for which dependable models may not be readily accessible. Results are presented for an HIL model of a planetary-gear-system hybrid electric vehicle with actual batteries in the loop of the simulation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.313
Threshold uncertainty score0.830

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.199
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicElectric and Hybrid Vehicle TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207