Identification of the Motifs and Amino Acids in Aggrecan G1 and G2 Domains Involved in Product Secretion
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Members of the large aggregating chondroitin sulfate proteoglycans are characterized by an N-terminal fragment known as G1 domain, which is composed of an immunoglobulin (IgG)-like motif and two tandem repeats (TR). Previous studies have indicated that the expressed product of aggrecan G1 domain was not secreted. Here we demonstrated that the inability of G1 secretion was associated with the tandem repeats but not the IgG-like motif, and specifically with TR1 of aggrecan. We also demonstrated that the G2 domain, a domain unique to aggrecan, had a similar effect on product secretion. The sequence of TR1 of G1 is highly conserved across species, which suggested similar functions played by these motifs. In a yeast two-hybrid assay, TR1 interacted with the calcium homeostasis endoplasmic reticulum protein. Deletion/mutation experiments indicated that the N-terminal fragment of TR1, in particular, the amino acids H(2)R(4) of this motif were key to its effect on product secretion. However, the N-terminal 55 amino acids were required to exert this function. Taken together, our study suggests a possible molecular mechanism for the function of the tandem repeats in product processing.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".