Left ventricular stroke volume in the fetal sheep is limited by extracardiac constraint and arterial pressure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Extracardiac constraint and sensitivity to arterial pressure may be critical factors that limit the functional reserves of the developing fetal heart in utero. We hypothesise that extracardiac constraint is the predominant factor that limits fetal stroke volume (SV). To test this hypothesis we studied six chronically instrumented fetal sheep to determine the relative roles that extracardiac constraint and arterial pressure play in determining left ventricular (LV) function. 2. Pregnant ewes (128-131 days gestation, term = 147 days) were anaesthetised (5 mg kg(-1) Propofol I.V., then 1.5 % halothane, 50 % O(2), balance N(2)O by inhalation) and instrumented using sterile surgical techniques to record LV end-diastolic pressure (P(lved)), aortic pressure (P(ao)), pericardial pressure (P(per)), and LV SV. 3. After a minimum of 72 h recovery, LV function was assessed by altering fetal blood volume to vary P(lved). Ventricular function curves were generated using two measures of ventricular function, SV and stroke work index (SWI = SV x P(ao)), and two measures of ventricular filling, P(lved) and LV end-diastolic transmural pressure (P(lved,tm) = P(lved) - P(per)). 4. Although decreasing P(lved) from the resting level decreased SV, increasing P(lved) from the resting level did not increase SV because the ventricular function curve plateaued. This plateau was not explained solely by an increase in aortic pressure, as the plateau remained present in the SWI versus P(lved) curve. When extracardiac constraint was accounted for (SV against P(lved,tm)), the plateau was largely eliminated (approximately 80 %). The remaining portion of the plateau (approximately 20 %) was eliminated when both extracardiac constraint and arterial pressure were accounted for (SWI versus P(lved,tm)). 5. Thus, the major limitation upon LV function in the near-term fetus results from extracardiac constraint limiting ventricular filling while, at the same time, a much smaller limitation arises from increasing arterial pressure.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".