Androsterone Derivatives Substituted at Position 16: Chemical Synthesis, Inhibition of Type 3 17β-hydroxysteroid Dehydrogenase, Binding Affinity for Steroid Receptors and Proliferative/antiproliferative Activity on Shionogi (AR +) Cells
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of androsterone (ADT) derivatives substituted at position 16 were efficiently synthesized in short reaction sequences; the ether analogues were also synthesized in the case of the methyl and allyl derivatives. The aim of this study was to develop inhibitors of the steroidogenic enzyme type 3 17beta-hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase and then evaluate their ability to inhibit this activity in transfected HEK-293 cells. For each compound we measured the percentage of inhibition of the transformation of 4-androstene-3,17-dione, the natural substrate of this steroidogenic enzyme, into the active androgen testosterone. The synthesized compounds proved to be weak inhibitors of this enzyme, but interestingly, these ADT derivatives do not bind to androgen, estrogen, glucocorticoid, and progestin receptors, suggesting no unsuitable receptor-mediated effects. One exception, 16alpha-(3'-bromopropyl)-5alpha-androstane-3alpha,17beta-diol, the only compound bearing a hydroxy group at position 17beta instead of a ketone, showed a strong binding affinity for the androgen receptor (70% at 1 microM) and also exhibited an antiproliferative activity on Shionogi (AR+) cells (86% at 1 microM), which was comparable to that of hydroxyflutamide, a pure antiandrogen (100% at 1 microM).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".