Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ionic regulation of Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange describes the secondary modulating effects exerted on exchange activity by the transport substrates Na(+) and Ca(2+). These effects have been extensively characterized for the cardiac Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchanger, NCX1.1, primarily by the giant excised patch-clamp technique. Moreover, several studies have provided functional evidence for ionic regulation of Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange activity in intact cellular systems. Through structure-function analyses, important protein domains involved in these regulatory processes have been identified. However, despite major progress in characterizing ionic regulation at the functional and molecular levels, the physiological importance of these processes remains unknown. In this study, we have examined Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchange activity for three members of the NCX1 family, namely NCX1.1, NCX1.3, and NCX1.4. These exchangers were expressed in Xenopus laevis oocytes and were characterized using the giant excised patch-clamp technique. We show that these three splice variants exhibit considerable differences in the kinetic features of their ionic regulatory profiles. Information of this type is beginning to provide insight into the physiological basis for tissue-specific expression of alternatively spliced Na(+)/Ca(2+) exchangers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".