MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2042845388 · doi:10.1159/000187001

Glomerular Epithelial Cell Endocytosis in Puromycin-Induced Glomerulopathy

2008· article· en· W2042845388 on OpenAlexaff
Yiming Wang, Paul Bass, Beryl Evans, Hywel Rhys Thomas, David R. Davies

Bibliographic record

Venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journals · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicRenal Diseases and Glomerulopathies
Canadian institutionsSt. Thomas Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEndocytosisPuromycinHorseradish peroxidaseBulk endocytosisGlomerulopathyReceptor-mediated endocytosisPodocyteVesicleNephrotic syndromeConjugateCell biologyEpitheliumEndocytic cycleCellKidneyGlomerulonephritisChemistryPathologyBiologyEndocrinologyMedicineMolecular biologyBiochemistryProteinuriaMembrane

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Glomerulopathy and nephrotic syndrome were induced in rats by intravenous puromycin aminonucleoside. Ten days after the injection of puromycin, the animals have developed heavy proteinuria. During this phase, glomerular epithelial cell endocytosis was studied by injecting a conjugate of horseradish peroxidase and poly-L-lysine. This conjugate has been shown to be endocytosed by glomerular epithelial cells. The rats were serially sacrificed from 1 min to 24 h after this injection. Peroxidase was localised cytochemically and observed at light and electron microscopy. The early events of endocytosis in glomerulopathy (namely the binding to the plasma membrane, the membrane invagination and the formation of the early vesicles) were qualitatively similar to those in the normal. The later events (the fusion of the vesicles and their movement within the cells) were inhibited. The results show that puromycin aminonucleoside damages epithelial cell endocytotic activity and affects the later processing of the conjugate within the cells.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.286
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue˜The œNephron journals/Nephron journalsSame topicRenal Diseases and GlomerulopathiesFrench-language works237,207