Estimation of seal pup production from aerial surveys using generalized additive models
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we estimate the pup production of harp seals ( Pagophilus groenlandicus ) using generalized additive models (GAMs) based on thin-plate regression splines. The spatial distribution of seal pups in a patch is modelled using GAMs, and the pup production is estimated by numerically integrating the model over a fine grid area of the patch. Closed form expression for estimation of the the standard error of the pup production estimate is derived. The estimators are applied to simulated seal populations to investigate their properties. The results show that the proposed pup production estimator is comparable with the conventional pup production estimator. However, the bias of the standard error estimator of the proposed method is much lower than the bias of the conventional standard error estimator. The decrease of standard error bias results in a considerable reduction of the coefficient of variation estimate using the proposed GAM-based method. The proposed method is also applied to real survey data of harp seals obtained from aerial surveys in the Greenland Sea pack ice in 2002. We show that the number of pups counted from aerial photographs possess a good fit to the negative binomial distribution when a logarithmic link function is applied. The approach described here is applicable to many situations where georeferenced counts or measurements are available.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".