Neural Network Approach for Nonlinear Aeroelastic Analysis
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A new approach is proposed, based on the use of artificial neural networks, for predicting nonlinear aeroelastic oscillations. Our objective is to reconstruct the asymptotic state of the nonlinear behavior of an aeroelastic model when only a limited segment of the transient data is known. An original neural network architecture is proposed and is used to predict the nonlinear motions of an aeroelastic system modeling a self-excited two-degree-of-freedom airfoil oscillating in pitch and plunge. When a segment of the transient state of the given signal is used for training, the neural network is capable of correctly predicting the corresponding limit-cycle oscillations, damped oscillations, or unstable divergent oscillations. The network training set consists of numerically generated data or data obtained from a wind-tunnel experiment. A neural network used in conjunction with a wavelet decomposition is presented, which proves to be capable of extracting the values of the damping coefficients and frequencies from the predicted signal. Neural networks, thus, prove to be useful tools in nonlinear aeroelastic analysis.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".