Impact of an extended photoperiod in farrowing houses on the performance and behaviour of sows and their litters
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of an extended photoperiod around parturition and throughout lactation on performances of primiparous sows and their piglets were studied. Sows were assigned to two light regimens: (1) standard (CTL, n = 28), 8 h of daily light from day 112 of gestation until day 23 of lactation; and (2) extended (TRT, n = 26), 23 h of daily light from day 112 of gestation to day 4 of lactation and 16 h thereafter. Colostrum intake was estimated based on a 24-h piglet weight gain starting at the end of farrowing. Piglets were weighed on days 4, 7, 14, 21 (weaning on day 23), 35 and 56. On days 4 and 21 of lactation, milk and blood samples were obtained. Behaviour was recorded on days 3 and 20. Piglet feed intakes were noted post-weaning until day 56. The TRT sows had lower concentrations of melatonin than the CTL sows on day 4 (P < 0.05), but prolactin concentrations, milk composition and colostrum intake by piglets were unaffected by treatment (P > 0.1). Litter growth during lactation was unaffected (P > 0.1), but TRT piglets consumed less feed between 23 and 34 d of age (P < 0.05) and weighed less on day 35 (P < 0.05). The TRT piglets were more active than CTL piglets on day 3 of lactation only (P < 0.05). Increasing the period of daily light in the farrowing house did not improve the performance of primiparous sows and their piglets. Key words: Behaviour, growth, lactation, photoperiod, piglet, sow
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".