MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043073173 · doi:10.2118/0705-0057-jpt

Hibernia Extended-Reach-Drilling and -Completion Record

2005· article· en· W2043073173 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Dennis Denney

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Petroleum Technology · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicDrilling and Well Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDrillingCompletion (oil and gas wells)GeologySubmarine pipelineScientific drillingOffshore drillingPetroleum engineeringEngineeringOceanographyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article, written by Technology Editor Dennis Denney, contains highlights of paper SPE 92347, "Hibernia Record Well Breaks Extended-Reach-Drilling and -Completion Envelope," by Carsten C. Elsborg, SPE, Esso Norway, and Adrian K. Power and Paul C. Schuberth, SPE, ExxonMobil Canada, prepared for the 2005 SPE/IADC Drilling Conference, Amsterdam, 23-25 February. In 2002, development began on the northernmost compartment of the Hibernia development project (Block A). To access these reserves, drilling and completing a 31,000-ft measured depth (MD) oil producer was proposed, with a horizontal departure and vertical depth that exceeded the industry extended-reach-drilling (ERD) limits. Successfully drilling this well required the application and extension of available technology. The project required a large monobore completion system. The trajectory required management of weak and unstable intervals across an extended 17,000-ft-MD intermediate section. To meet these challenges, existing local experiences were leveraged, and recognized international expertise was used to supplement existing practices. Introduction The Hibernia development project is in 265 ft of water, 200 miles offshore Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada’s easternmost province, in the Grand Banks region of the Atlantic Ocean. Reservoir access is provided by use of an iceberg-resistant gravity-based-structure (GBS) platform (Fig. 1) with 64 well slots. Two fully equipped and independent drilling rigs service the wells. Drilling was initiated from the structure in 1997. From the beginning, the project was envisioned as an ERD development that would extend the technology and experience limits as the platform matured. The reservoir is a series of thick-layered sandstones separated by intermediate shales. It is subdivided into large compartments or blocks by a series of faults that run bidirectionally across the reservoir (Fig. 2). These faults are highly sealing in nature and, hence, form the independent subreservoirs or fault blocks that make up the larger reserves. In 2002, the operator began accessing Block A, the largest undeveloped reserves block in the project. The block also was the farthest from the platform (approximately 4.5 miles). At the time, several extended-reach wellbores had been drilled to more than 20,000 ft MD. Careful evaluation was made of drilling a subsea-satellite well vs. use of ERD technologies and knowledge gained on similar Hibernia wellbores. The team recommended the ERD option to drill what would become Hibernia B-16 36 (OPA1), the longest well in the world at this true vertical depth (TVD). The reward for success would be significant from a cost-savings perspective if the incremental risks from a drilling and completion standpoint could be mitigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.504
Threshold uncertainty score0.534

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.186
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Petroleum TechnologySame topicDrilling and Well EngineeringFrench-language works237,207