MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043098144 · doi:10.4153/cjm-2001-018-8

Values of the Dedekind Eta Function at Quadratic Irrationalities: Corrigendum

2001· erratum· en· W2043098144 on OpenAlexaff
Alfred J. van der Poorten, Kenneth S. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Mathematics · 2001
Typeerratum
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicRings, Modules, and Algebras
Canadian institutionsCarleton University
FundersAustralian Research Council
KeywordsMathematicsLemma (botany)Ideal (ethics)Dedekind cutRemainderPrime (order theory)Pure mathematicsQuadratic equationFunction (biology)Dedekind sumArithmeticCombinatoricsDiscrete mathematicsGeometryPhilosophyEpistemology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Habib Muzaffar of Carleton University has pointed out to the authors that in their paper [A] only the result follows from the prime ideal theorem with remainder for ideal classes, and not the stronger result stated in Lemma 5.2. This necessitates changes in Sections 5 and 6 of [A]. The main results of the paper are not affected by these changes. It should also be noted that, starting on page 177 of [A], each and every occurrence of o ( s − 1) should be replaced by o(1). Sections 5 and 6 of [A] have been rewritten to incorporate the abovementioned correction and are given below. They should replace the original Sections 5 and 6 of [A].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.696
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of MathematicsSame topicRings, Modules, and AlgebrasFrench-language works237,207