Experimental and Theoretical Investigations of Lithium and Magnesium Derivatives of Bis(<i>tert</i>-butylamido)cyclodiphosph(III/V)- and (V/V)azane Mono- and Ditellurides
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Deprotonation of bis(tert-butylamido)cyclophosph(III/III)azane with organolithium or organomagnesium reagents followed by oxidation with elemental tellurium is a viable approach to the preparation of metal cyclodiphosphazane mono- and ditellurides. The reaction of the cyclodiphosph(III)azane [tBu(H)NP(mu-NtBu)2PN(H)tBu] (1) with elemental tellurium in boiling toluene affords the monotelluride [tBu(H)N(Te)P(mu-NtBu)2PN(H)tBu] (9). A similar reaction involving the magnesium salt Mg[tBuNP(mu-NtBu)2PNtBu](THF)2 (2) also yields a monotelluride Mg[tBuN(Te)P(mu-NtBu)2PNtBu]-(THF)2 (10). By contrast, reaction of the lithium salt Li2[tBuNP(mu-NtBu)2PNtBu](THF)2 (3) with tellurium results in double oxidation and the formation of the ditellurides Li2[tBuN(Te)P(mu-NtBu)2P(Te)NtBu](THF)4 (11) and Li2-[tBuN(Te)P(mu-NtBu)2P(Te)NtBu](tmeda)2 (12). Compounds 9-12 have been characterized by multinuclear (1H, 7Li, 13C, 31P, and 125Te) NMR, while 9, 10, and 12 have also been characterized by X-ray crystallography. The structure of 9 reveals a typical cis/endo, exo arrangement, with no intermolecular contacts to tellurium. The seco-heterocubic structure, observed in 2, is retained in 10, with the ligand chelating magnesium in an N,N',N"-manner. Unique coordination behavior is exhibited by the ditelluride 12, in which the dianionic ligand is attached to the two lithium centers in both Te,Te' and Te,N bonding modes. Multinuclear NMR data are consistent with retention of the solid-state structures of 9-12 in solution at low temperatures. The reactivity of cyclodiphosph(III/III)azanes toward chalcogens is rationalized by using theoretical calculations (semiempirical PM3 level of theory), which show an inverse correlation between the charge at the phosphorus center and the ease of oxidation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".