MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043182103 · doi:10.2523/iptc-16747-ms

Response Analysis of Pipeline Subjected to Active Fault

2013· article· en· W2043182103 on OpenAlexaff
Zhongliang Jiao, BaoQun Wang, Bin Wu

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Petroleum Technology Conference · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground Structures
Canadian institutionsPetro-Canada
FundersChina University of Petroleum, Beijing
KeywordsPipeline (software)Pipeline transportFinite element methodFault (geology)Structural engineeringComputer scienceCode (set theory)EngineeringGeologyMechanical engineeringSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Aiming at the requirement of pipelines' seismic design, the code of "Seismic Technical Code for Oil and Gas Transmission Pipeline Engineering" was published, and the code presented the seismic design method of pipelines subjected to active fault, and pointed out that finite element method is necessary when pipeline is axial compressed. Based on the strain calculation method proposed by the code, this paper discuss the influence factors such as pipeline-fault angle and pipeline buried depth, then presents pipeline strain variation trend when subjected to active fault movement. Meanwhile, this paper adopts finite element method to analyze pipeline strain distribution, and points out that pipeline strain is composed of axial tension/compress strain and bend strain, which could explain the pipeline strain distribution, and the elliptic phenomenon of pipeline should be considered in the future research works and code revision. This paper provides the technical reference for pipeline seismic design.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.402
Threshold uncertainty score0.575

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.224
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Petroleum Technology ConferenceSame topicGeotechnical Engineering and Underground StructuresFrench-language works237,207