<scp>SRAP</scp> as an Informative Molecular Marker to Study the <i>Fusarium poae</i> Genetic Variability
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Fusarium poae is one of the Fusarium species isolated from grains associated with Fusarium head blight ( FHB ), whose occurrence has increased in the last years. In this study, a total of 105 F. poae isolates from Argentina, Belgium, Canada, England, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, Luxembourg, Poland, Switzerland and Uruguay were evaluated using sequence‐related amplified polymorphism ( SRAP ) to analyse the capacity of this molecular marker to evaluate the F. poae genetic variability. The molecular analysis showed high intraspecific variability within F. poae isolates, and a partial relationship was revealed between variability and the host/geographic origin. Analysis of molecular variance ( amova ) indicated a high genetic variability in the F. poae collection, with most of the genetic variability resulting from differences within, rather than between American and European populations. The analysis of sequenced SRAP fragments targets into hypothetical proteins from different Fusarium species showing that the SRAP technique not only allows studying F. poae genetic variability, but also targets coding regions into the F. poae genome. To our knowledge, this is the first report on genetic variability of F. poae using SRAP technique and also demonstrates the efficacy of this molecular marker to amplify open reading frames in fungus.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it