MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043222058 · doi:10.1119/1.2723801

Temperature dependence of the capacitance of a ferroelectric material

2007· article· en· W2043222058 on OpenAlex
John Bechhoefer, Yi Deng, Joel Zylberberg, Chao Lei, Zuo‐Guang Ye

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAmerican Journal of Physics · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCapacitanceCurie temperatureCondensed matter physicsCapacitorFerroelectricityBarium titanateRelaxation (psychology)PhysicsCeramicDielectricCuriePermittivityThermodynamicsMaterials scienceComposite materialFerromagnetismVoltageOptoelectronicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We present an alternate version of the undergraduate laboratory experiment developed by Dixon [Am. J. Phys. 75, 1038–1045 (2007)] that is suitable for second-year students. We study the temperature variation of the capacitance of a ferroelectric ceramic derived from barium titanate, the Ba(Ti0.9Sn0.1)O3 solid solution. The ratio of tin to titanium is chosen to provide a convenient Curie temperature near 50°C. Using careful temperature control and real-time capacitance measurements, we track the time evolution of the capacitance in response to temperature changes at 5Hz for runs that last up to a day. At temperatures well above the Curie temperature, TC, the capacitance relaxation is well-described by a single exponential decay. Near TC, the relaxation is linear in the logarithm of time over more than three decades. For T>TC, the permittivity deviates from the Curie–Weiss law and follows another phenomenological form commonly used to describe relaxor perovskite-ceramic capacitors.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.464

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.228
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it