Neutrality, niches, and determinants of plankton metacommunity structure across boreal wetland ponds
Why is this work in the frame?
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.
The three-model screen
all 1,000 screened works →All three models called this out of scope.
Determinants of plankton metacommunity structure in wetland ponds; community ecology.
This ecological study examines plankton metacommunity structure, not research practice.
Plankton metacommunity ecology across wetland ponds; environmental biology domain study.
Abstract
We examined the determinants of zooplankton and phytoplankton metacommunity structure across 25 boreal wetland ponds. Our objective was to determine whether plankton metacommunities exhibit spatial structuring, thus suggesting neutrality, or are merely structured by local environmental features, suggesting that they are under niche-based control. According to Redundancy Analysis (RDA), zooplankton community structure was primarily controlled by concentration of major ions and geographical location of the pond, while phytoplankton community structure was primarily controlled by major ion concentration, nitrogen concentration, and geographical location. According to variance partitioning in RDA, zooplankton community structure was attributed more to pure spatial position of the pond (16.7% of variance) than to pure environmental factors (4.7% of variance). For phytoplankton, community composition was controlled by both spatial and environmental factors, although the effect of pure spatial position (11.1% of variance) on phytoplankton community structure was somewhat weaker than for zooplankton. For zooplankton, community similarity was negatively (P < 0.01) related to both geographical and environmental distance. For phytoplankton, community similarity was negatively (P < 0.05) related only to geographical distance. Finally, cluster analyses showed that zooplankton and phytoplankton communities formed highly dissimilar groupings, thus implying low community concordance. Our results suggest that both zooplankton and phytoplankton comply with both neutral and niche-based models. Our results further imply that even across small spatial scales and even for small organisms such as plankton, communities might be strongly spatially structured. The finding that spatial configuration was even more important than local environmental factors in controlling zooplankton community composition suggests that zooplankton may be dispersal-limited within relatively small spatial scales or that zooplankton metacommunities might be related to mass effects.
Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.
The record
- Venue
- Ecoscience
- Topic
- Coastal wetland ecosystem dynamics
- Field
- Environmental Science
- Canadian institutions
- —
- Funders
- Rural Development Administration
- Keywords
- ZooplanktonPhytoplanktonEcologyPlanktonCommunity structureMetacommunityEnvironmental scienceSpatial ecologyBiologyBiological dispersalNutrient
- Has abstract in OpenAlex
- yes