MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043225036 · doi:10.1167/11.11.573

The right anterior temporal lobe variant of prosopagnosia

2011· article· es· W2043225036 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vision · 2011
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldNeuroscience
TopicSpatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFusiform face areaSuperior temporal sulcusTemporal lobePsychologyPerceptionTemporal cortexFace perceptionSulcusAudiologyCognitive psychologyFacial expressionNeuroscienceCommunicationMedicineEpilepsy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Prosopagnosia following right anterior temporal lesions alone has rarely been described, though functional imaging has suggested that face processing involves regions like aIT, anterior to the core face processing network (the fusiform face area, FFA, occipital face area, OFA, and superior temporal sulcus, STS). Prior work has hypothesized that anterior temporal lesions could cause an associative or amnestic variant of prosopagnosia, though it has been questioned whether this can be independent of a multimodal semantic deficit for people. Objective: Our goal was to determine the type of face recognition deficit after lesions limited to the right anterior temporal lobe. Method: We evaluated face recognition, perception and imagery as well as semantic knowledge about people in two subjects with prosopagnosia following herpes encephalitis causing right temporal pole lesions, in whom fMRI confirmed the integrity of FFA, OFA, and STS. Results: Both subjects performed normally on nearly all tests of perception of facial configuration and features, discrimination of face gender, and face detection. Subject R-AT2 was mildly impaired in discriminating changes in identity when expression also varied, and vice versa, suggesting some difficulty with invariant representations. Subject R-AT3 had mild impairments in discriminating eye shape and mouth changes, but far less severe than in subjects with FFA/OFA damage. In contrast, both subjects had markedly impaired face imagery. Finally, both subjects performed well on identifying famous names and linking semantic data such as occupation to names, in contrast to another subject with bilateral anterior temporal lesions. Conclusion: The right anterior temporal variant of prosopagnosia is characterized by impaired access to facial memories with relatively preserved face perception and semantic knowledge about people, consistent with an amnestic or associative functional subtype of prosopagnosia.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.365
Threshold uncertainty score0.394

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.252 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it