Patient‐controlled bupivacaine infusion into the infrapatellar fat pad after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: The goal of the study was to determine the safety and analgesic efficacy of a patient-controlled infusion pump that dispenses bupivacaine extra-articularly to the infrapatellar fat pad after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction with ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autogenous graft. TYPE OF STUDY: Prospective clinical study. METHODS: Twenty-one consecutive patients were enrolled in the study. After surgery, the catheter of a bupivacaine infusion pump was implanted extra-articularly onto the infrapatellar fat pad. Ten patients were given infusion pumps with 50 mL of 0.5% bupivacaine to be self-administered for analgesia. Eleven patients were given infusion pumps with 50 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Opioid analgesics were available if patients were unable to control the pain solely with the bupivacaine pump. Historic controls consisted of 62 consecutive patients who underwent ACL reconstruction before study initiation. Patients recorded volumes of self-administered bupivacaine; also recorded were postoperative pain levels using a visual analog scale (VAS). Opioid analgesic usage was measured and compared with historic controls. RESULTS: Amount of bupivacaine infused and VAS recorded pain levels were not significantly different between the 0.5% and the 0.25% bupivacaine groups. Opioid analgesic usage was significantly reduced when the 0.5% bupivacaine group was compared with historic controls (mean morphine equivalents via intramuscular route: 0.5% group, 17.6 mg; historic controls, 66.4 mg; P =.015). This was also significant when normalized by patient weight (0.5% group, 0.227 mg/kg; historic controls, 0.880 mg/kg; P =.023). Opioid usage in the 0.25% group (35.7 mg and 0.540 mg/kg) was also less than historic controls; however, this was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Infrapatellar fat pad infusion with 0.5% bupivacaine may provide enhanced analgesia after ACL reconstruction with ipsilateral bone-patellar tendon-bone autogenous graft. A double-blinded, randomized control trial with a greater number of patients is required to confirm these findings.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".