Effects of amiloride, benzamil, and alterations in extracellular Na<sup>+</sup> on the rat afferent arteriole and its myogenic response
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Recent studies have implicated epithelial Na+ channels (ENaC) in myogenic signaling. The present study was undertaken to determine if ENaC and/or Na+ entry are involved in the myogenic response of the rat afferent arteriole. Myogenic responses were assessed in the in vitro hydronephrotic kidney model. ENaC expression and membrane potential responses were evaluated with afferent arterioles isolated from normal rat kidneys. Our findings do not support a role of ENaC, in that ENaC channel blockers did not reduce myogenic responses and ENaC expression could not be demonstrated in this vessel. Reducing extracellular Na+ concentration ([Na+]o; 100 mmol/l) did not attenuate myogenic responses, and amiloride had no effect on membrane potential. Benzamil, an inhibitor of ENaC that also blocks Na+/Ca2+ exchange (NCX), potentiated myogenic vasoconstriction. Benzamil and low [Na+]o elicited vasoconstriction; however, these responses were attenuated by diltiazem and were associated with significant membrane depolarization, suggesting a contribution of mechanisms other than a reduction in NCX. Na+ repletion induced a vasodilation in pressurized afferent arterioles preequilibrated in low [Na+]o, a hallmark of NCX, and this response was reduced by 10 micromol/l benzamil. The dilation was eliminated, however, by a combination of benzamil plus ouabain, suggesting an involvement of the electrogenic Na+-K+-ATPase. In concert, these findings refute the premise that ENaC plays a significant role in the rat afferent arteriole and instead suggest that reducing [Na+](o) and/or Na+ entry is coupled to membrane depolarization. The mechanisms underlying these unexpected and paradoxical effects of Na+ are not resolved at the present time.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".