MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043244359 · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.041802

How to measure the duration of subfemtosecond xuv laser pulses using asymmetric photoionization

2003· article· en· W2043244359 on OpenAlexaff
André D. Bandrauk, Szczepan Chelkowski, Nguyen Hong Shon

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review A · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicLaser-Matter Interactions and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAttosecondLaserExtreme ultravioletAsymmetryPhotoionizationAtomic physicsPulse durationPolarization (electrochemistry)Ultrashort pulseOpticsLinear polarizationPulse (music)DetectorIonizationQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A technique for directly measuring the duration of subfemtosecond extreme ultraviolet (xuv) laser pulses is proposed. Using the numerical solutions of the time-dependent Schr\"odinger equation for a H atom in the combined field of a near-infrared femtosecond and an xuv attosecond (asec) laser pulse (both linearly polarized), we show that the photoelectrons are emitted preferentially in a forward (or backward) direction, along the laser polarization vector, depending on the delay between two pulses. Our calculations show that the normalized maximal asymmetry ${P}_{3}({\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{asec}})$ (i.e., the signal difference measured by a forward and a backward detector divided by the total signal) exhibits a simple linear dependence on the duration ${\ensuremath{\tau}}_{\mathrm{asec}}$ of the attosecond pulse thus allowing one to easily compute the attosecond-pulse duration from measured asymmetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.508
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePhysical Review ASame topicLaser-Matter Interactions and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207