Disqualification professionnelle et expériences temporelles: enquête auprès des immigrants francophones africains installés en Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Bien que les effets economiques de l'obstacle systemique de la non-reconnaissance des competences des immigrants soient de plus en plus documentes, les impacts a long terme de ce phenomene sont insuffisamment examines. Dans cet article, nous essayons de mieux comprendre les effets de cet obstacle sur les experiences temporelles des immigrants francophones africains. Pour 'survivre' et contourner l'obstacle de la non-reconnaissance de leurs competences, les immigrants interroges affirment qu'ils doivent inventer des 'strategies de survie'. La plupart de ces strategies les enferment dans une circularite qui les empeche de s'adapter a la culture temporelle de la societe d'accueil canadienne. Cette situation illustre un paradoxe au cœur d'une societe multiculturelle qui accueille, mais qui dresse en meme temps, dans ses pratiques sociales, des barrieres qui empechent l'immigrant de s'adapter aux valeurs promues.Although the economic effects of the systemic obstacle of the non-recognition of the credentials of...
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.022 | 0.008 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".