MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043328654 · doi:10.1111/jvs.12093

Effects of microhabitat and growth form on bryophyte mortality associated with leaf litter burial in a boreal spruce forest

2013· article· en· W2043328654 on OpenAlex
Martin Schmalholz, Gustaf Granath

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Vegetation Science · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicBryophyte Studies and Records
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
FundersVetenskapsrådet
KeywordsBryophyteLitterTaigaForest floorDeciduousBiologyPlant litterMossEcologyBorealCanopyBotanyEcosystem

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Questions Do mortality rates of boreal bryophytes associated with leaf litter burial vary with degree of shelter on forest floor microsites in spruce‐dominated forests? Do erect and prostrate species respond similarly? What is the relative importance of deciduous leaves (from aspen and birch) vs conifer needles as bryophyte mortality agents? Location Boreal spruce forests of central S weden. Methods A transplant study examining mortality was set up with four different bryophyte species: two creeping, prostrate liverworts ( C alypogeia integristipula and L epidozia reptans ) and two more erect mosses ( R hytidiadelphus triquetrus and H ylocomiastrum umbratum ). We tested for differences in mortality rates associated with leaf litter burial in three microhabitats differing in degree of shelter on the forest floor, i.e. sheltered (large boulders, tree bases of spruce) and unsheltered (open forest floor). Results After two growing seasons, 12.7% of the bryophyte transplants (40 out of 316, of which 37 transplants were prostrate liverworts) were dead, presumably due to litter burial. These two prostrate liverworts displayed significantly higher mortality rates close to boulders and at tree bases compared to unsheltered forest floors. Furthermore, although only comprising a small portion of the canopy (<10%), deciduous litter accounted for 53% of all transplants that were buried by litter, compared to 47% for conifer needle litter. Conclusion We find fine‐scale spatial patchiness in the responses of bryophytes to litter fall. Mortality of prostrate liverworts associated with litter burial varies among microhabitats on the forest floor, with significantly higher mortality at sheltered microsites (here exemplified by boulders and tree bases) compared to erect moss species. Bryophytes close to microtopographic structures (e.g. boulders and trees) are more strongly exposed to litter burial, but such structures can also function as refuges under disturbance events such as clear‐cuts and windthrows. In addition, they may contain convex surfaces that accumulate less litter than flat or convex forest floor surfaces. The observed large effect of litter burial associated with bryophyte mortality, and the variation among microhabitats and species growth forms, suggest that incorporation of litter fall is of vital importance for our understanding of the dynamics of forest bryophyte communities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.131
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.212 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it