MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043454881 · doi:10.1680/geot.2007.57.7.581

Crack initiation in clay observed in beam bending

2007· article· en· W2043454881 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGéotechnique · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSoil and Unsaturated Flow
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsGeotechnical engineeringUltimate tensile strengthMaterials scienceCrackingComposite materialSuctionPore water pressureGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Tensile cracking in clay is an important phenomenon that affects the strength and permeability of clays in many facilities, such as dams, embankments and landfill liners, as well as being a precursor to slope failures in the natural terrain. This study investigates the stress–strain criteria for cracking in clays by performing four-point bending tests on consolidated kaolin clay beams. Load-controlled and strain-controlled tests were performed on clay beams with varying initial suction to understand the stress–strain criteria for crack initiation in clay. At no stage was the negative pore pressure permitted to exceed the air entry value of the clay, so the clay remained saturated throughout. Strains in the clay were obtained by particle image velocimetry analysis of digital images of the clay beam, and suction measurements were obtained from pore pressure and tension transducers installed within the clay beams. Results from this investigation showed that the threshold tensile strain to cracking in kaolin clay decreased from about 4% at an initial mean effective stress of 15 kPa to about 1·5% at an initial mean effective stress of 100 kPa. The extreme fibre stress at failure of the clay beams indicated an effective tensile strength that was a fraction, dropping from 0·27 to 0·11 of the preconsolidation pressure as the overconsolidation ratio increased from about 2 to about 20. Alternatively, the tensile strength could be regarded as 0·45 ± 0·15 of the geometric mean of the preconsolidation pressure in the plane of shear and the initial mean effective stress. Most significantly, evidence is presented of a new understanding of cracking in clays. Cracks were seen to open either as pure tension cracks at zero minor principal effective stress, or as mixed-mode shear-tension cracks when an effective stress path reaches the Hvorslev criterion of brittle shear rupture, but only if the minor total stress is also tensile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.213
Threshold uncertainty score0.445

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.215 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it