Experimental Evaluation of Connections in Hybrid Precast Concrete Bridge Truss Girders
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An innovative, corrosion-free, precast, prestressed concrete truss girder has been developed for short- and medium-span, slab-on-girder bridges. The girder consists of top and bottom concrete flanges connected by precast vertical and diagonal members and made of fiber-reinforced polymer (FRP) tubes filled with concrete. The verticals and diagonals are connected, respectively, to the concrete flanges by means of glass FRP dowels and stud reinforcement made of corrosion-resistant steel or FRP material. The flanges are pretensioned with carbon FRP tendons. The deck slab is reinforced with corrosion-resistant steel bars in the bottom transverse layer and with glass FRP bars in the bottom longitudinal and the top layers. The girders may be posttensioned with external carbon FRP tendons to balance the slab weight and to provide continuity in multispan bridges. The new system has the advantages of light weight and enhanced durability. The light weight reduces the initial cost and allows for longer spans. The improved durability reduces the maintenance cost and extends the structure's life span. This paper describes the general details of the system and presents an experimental evaluation of its critical components, namely, the FRP tubes and the truss connections. Two types of FRP tubes and four types of connections were investigated. The results are presented of tests of eight connection specimens under static loading and four specimens under fatigue. The tests showed excellent performance of the connections when filament-wound tubes and continuous double-headed studs were used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".