Reversibility of the Effects of Subchronic Exposure to the Cancer Chemotherapeutics Bleomycin, Etoposide, and Cisplatin on Spermatogenesis, Fertility, and Progeny Outcome in the Male Rat
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Testicular cancer is the most common cancer among young men of reproductive age. A regimen of bleomycin, etoposide, and cisplatin (BEP regimen) is the standard chemotherapy for testicular cancer. BEP has adverse effects on spermatogenic function that pose a long-term reproductive health risk to cancer survivors and their progeny. Using a rat model, we investigated the persistence of the effects of BEP on male reproductive function, fertility, and progeny outcome. Adult male Sprague-Dawley rats received a BEP regimen mimicking human clinical exposure (three 21-day cycles of etoposide and cisplatin on days 1-5 and bleomycin on days 2, 9, and 16, or vehicle). Reproductive and progeny outcome parameters were assessed at the end of BEP treatment and up to 9 weeks post-treatment, at 3-week intervals. BEP treatment reduced testicular weights and impaired spermatogenesis, characterized by abnormal testis histology and germ cell depletion. Germ cell apoptosis increased at least 3-fold in BEP-treated rats compared with controls at the end of treatment; 9 weeks posttreatment, germ cell apoptosis in BEP-treated rats did not differ from controls. BEP-exposed males were fertile; a decrease in litter size and an increase in preimplantation and postimplantation losses were observed. Preimplantation loss remained elevated in litters sired by BEP-treated males up to 9 weeks posttreatment; however, neither postimplantation loss nor litter sizes differed from controls. Thus, both germ cell apoptosis and the postimplantation loss induced by BEP treatment were reversible. The persistence of the elevation in preimplantation loss 9 weeks after BEP treatment suggests that spermatogonia are affected.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".