MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043638322 · doi:10.1002/jnr.21094

Telomerase and neuronal marker status of differentiated NT2 and SK‐N‐SH human neuronal cells and primary human neurons

2006· article· en· W2043638322 on OpenAlexaff
Pooja Jain, Maria Antonietta Cerone, Andréa C. LeBlanc, Chantal Autexier

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neuroscience Research · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTelomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityJewish General Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTelomeraseNeuroDBiologyCell biologyRetinoic acidCellular differentiationPopulationTelomerase reverse transcriptaseP19 cellMolecular biologyCell cultureAdult stem cellMedicineBiochemistryGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Upon treatment with retinoic acid, NTera-2 (NT2) human teratocarcinoma and SK-N-SH neuroblastoma cells can be induced to terminally differentiate into postmitotic neuronal cells. The neuronal cell yield obtained from the NT-2 cells is partially dependent on the time of differentiation (24-55 days). SK-N-SH cells differentiate into a mixed population of neuronal and epithelium-like cells. Here we report modified protocols that increase the number of differentiated NT-2 and SK-N-SH cells and that establish an enriched neuronal SK-N-SH-derived cell population essentially devoid of nonneuronal cells. Differentiated cells express the cytoskeleton-associated protein tau and other typical neuronal markers, such as Map2, Ngn1, NeuroD, Mash1, and GluR which are also expressed in primary human fetal neurons. Telomerase activity is down-regulated in differentiated cells, which is consistent with the telomerase status of primary fetal human neurons. Thus, differentiated NT2 and SK-N-SH cells may represent an excellent source for studies investigating the role of telomerase or other survival-promoting activities in protecting human neuronal cells from cell death-mediating stresses associated with neurodegenerative diseases.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.859
Threshold uncertainty score0.862

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.359
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2006
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neuroscience ResearchSame topicTelomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceFrench-language works237,207