A re‐evaluation of gelsolin at ectoplasmic specializations in sertoli cells: The influence of serum in blocking buffers on staining patterns
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this study, we test the hypothesis that gelsolin immunolocalized in actin filament-rich ectoplasmic specializations may be exogenous gelsolin present in normal serum used in blocking buffers, and that binds to the intercellular adhesion plaques during tissue processing. Fixed frozen sections of rat and rabbit testis were pre-treated with standard blocking buffers containing 5% normal goat serum (NGS) and then incubated with anti-gelsolin antibodies in the presence of 1% NGS. Other sections were treated in a similar fashion, but in buffers not containing NGS. Sections were then labeled with secondary antibody conjugated to a fluorochrome. Localized staining at ectoplasmic specializations occurred only in sections treated with NGS. The only positive staining in sections not treated with NGS was associated with seminiferous tubule walls and blood vessels in rabbit tissue. The antibodies reacted with a single band at the appropriate molecular weight for gelsolin on immunoblots of NGS, but did not react on immunoblots of testis or seminiferous epithelium. We conclude that gelsolin localized at ectoplasmic specializations using current commercially available antibodies is a result of non-specific binding to the fixed tissues of gelsolin present in blocking buffers.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".