Extreme sulphur isotope fractionation in the deep Cretaceous biosphere
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract: Isotopically light sulphur in sedimentary pyrite was generally predominant during the Cretaceous as a consequence of volcanic and hydrothermal activity and bacterial sulphate reduction (BSR). However, we report super-high sulphur isotopic compositions of sedimentary pyrite (δ 34 S +89.3‰) from late mid-Cretaceous sediments from the Central Apennines, Italy. These exceptionally high δ 34 S values are not consistent with current models for interpreting the geological record for sulphur isotopes because these cannot explain the extreme isotopic fractionation observed in our study. Precise details of the mechanism for producing pyrite so highly enriched in 34 S remain elusive, but the large variation in δ 34 S values (>70‰) within the analysed samples and the considerable micro-scale variations in δ 34 S (up to 50‰ even within a single nodule) indicate a complex mechanism of sulphate reduction and pyrite precipitation. This includes early removal of isotopically light H 2 S by pyrite precipitation in the water column, diffusion and advection of H 2 S and SO 4 2− , and finally BSR. Similar but less severe conditions occur in the Black Sea and in deep ocean sediments. These new findings provide new insights for the interpretation of the palaeoceanographic conditions that prevailed during the Mesozoic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".