Synthesis and characterization of polystyrene oligomers with several pendent epoxy groups
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Living polystyryl lithium was synthesized by anionic polymerization under the protection of argon at normal pressure, and styrene, toluene, tetrahydrofuran, and n‐butyllithium were used as a monomer, solvent, polar reagent, and initiator, respectively. Then, polystyrene oligomers containing several pendent epoxy groups with well‐defined structures and narrow molecular weight distributions (weight‐average molecular weight/number‐average molecular weight < 1.1) were prepared by the reaction of polystyryl lithium with glycidyl methacrylate. The prepared oligomers were characterized with gel permeation chromatography, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, 1H‐NMR, and the hydrochloric acid/dioxane argentimetric method. The effects of the glycidyl methacrylate dosage, molar mass of polystyrene precursors, copolymerization time, and temperature on the content of side epoxy groups were also investigated. The results confirm that 1,1‐diphenylethylene‐end‐capped polystyryl carbanion could initiate glycidyl methacrylate in toluene in the presence of lithium chloride and a small amount of tetrahydrofuran, and the content of the side epoxy groups could be adjusted. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Appl Polym Sci, 2010
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".