MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Topographic and Dipolar Analysis of Laser‐Evoked Potentials During Migraine Attack

2004· article· en· W2043707484 on OpenAlexaff
Marina de Tommaso, Marco Guido, Giuseppe Libro, Luciana Losito, Olimpia Difruscolo, Francomichele Puca, Luigi Maria Specchio, A. Carella

Bibliographic record

VenueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face Pain · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMigraine and Headache Studies
Canadian institutionsJaneway Children's Health and Rehabilitation Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMigraineScalpElectroencephalographyAuraCortical spreading depressionEvoked potentialPsychologyForeheadAnesthesiaAudiologyMedicineNeuroscienceSurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to perform further evaluation of laser-evoked potentials (LEPs) during migraine attacks using multichannel recording and topographic analysis. Specifically, this study aimed to confirm the pattern previously observed in acute migraine, while also defining the components of LEPs that are mainly modified during headache, as well as the correlation between features of LEPs and clinical variables. In addition, we aimed to conduct a dipolar source analysis of the main LEP waves in migraine patients to check the variability in the source location of LEPs during acute migraine. BACKGROUND: An amplitude enhancement of LEPs was previously detected during migraine attack using a single scalp derivation on the vertex; hyperalgesia to heat stimuli was also detected for both the face and hand. METHODS: Eighteen patients suffering from migraine without aura were analyzed. The supraorbital zones and the dorsum of the hand were stimulated on both the symptomatic and nonsymptomatic sides in all patients. The LEPs were recorded via 25 scalp electrodes. Dipolar source analysis of the P2 components was performed using a spherical model in all patients and using a realistic Magnetic Resonance model in four patients. RESULTS: During attacks, the later waves, and particularly the P2 component, were significantly enhanced; the amplitude of the P2 component obtained during the attack by stimulation of the supraorbital zone on the side of the headache was significantly correlated with the intensity of pain and the frequency of headache. In our patients, the P2 wave was generated in the anterior cingulate cortex, with a shift toward its rostrocaudal portion, and was mainly devoted to elaboration of the emotive compound of pain during migraine attack. CONCLUSIONS: Cortical activation by laser stimuli during migraine attack was confirmed. This effect was more pronounced in patients with a higher frequency of migraine attacks. This may be due to a lack of inhibitory control over the transmission of pain to the cortex. The increased activation of cortical areas devoted to attention and emotion may be linked to headache.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.251
Threshold uncertainty score0.444

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.020
GPT teacher head0.289
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations41
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHeadache The Journal of Head and Face PainSame topicMigraine and Headache StudiesFrench-language works237,207