Impact of Nutrition and Exposure to the Parasite<i>Plagiorchis elegans</i>(Trematoda: Plagiorchiidae) on the Development of<i>Aedes aegypti</i>(Diptera: Culicidae): Analysis by Time-Dependent Transition Probabilities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effects of food availability and the presence of the entomopathogenic digenean parasite Plagiorchis elegans (Rudolphi) on the probability of Aedes aegypti (L.) preimagos to transform from one developmental stage to the next over consecutive 24- or 48-h periods were quantified. Under conditions of low food availability, 24- and 48-h transition probabilities for all larval instars to the next were reduced. Increases in food availability reversed this process, causing significant decreases in same-stage transition probabilities. However, as transition to successive stages increased among first, second, third, and fourth instars, there was a concomitant, significant increase in first- and fourth-instar mortality. Exposure to P. elegans cercariae caused significant decreases in the 24- and 48-h same-state probabilities for all preimago stages. Successive stage transitions for first, second, and third instars were significantly increased, whereas those of fourth instars and pupae were significantly decreased with exposure to parasites. Mortality among all preimago stages increased significantly with exposure, but was highest among fourth instars and pupae. There were strong food-by-parasite interaction effects among first, second, and third instars. Differences in transition probabilities increased with increasing food levels between control and parasite-exposed sets. Whereas there was no significant interaction effect between food and the presence of the parasite in pupae, significantly more fourth instars died in response to parasite exposure and the food-by-parasite interaction effect on the probability of fourth instars transforming to pupae over 48 h approached significance. Adult emergence reflected the above effects. These findings are discussed in the context of the Ae. aegypti/P. elegans host/parasite association and the role of entomopathogenic digeneans as natural enemies and their potential as agents in the biological control of mosquitoes.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".