Kinetic simulation of secondary electron emission effects in Hall thrusters
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The particle-in-cell code has been developed for kinetic simulations of Hall thrusters with a focus on plasma-wall interaction. It is shown that the effect of secondary electron emission on wall losses is different from predictions of previous fluid and kinetic studies. In simulations, the electron velocity distribution function is strongly anisotropic, depleted at high energy, and nonmonotonic. Secondary electrons form two beams propagating between the walls of a thruster channel in opposite radial directions. The beams produce secondary electron emission themselves depending on their energy at the moment of impact with the wall, which is defined by the electric and magnetic fields in the thruster as well as by the electron transit time between the walls. The condition for the space-charge-limited secondary electron emission depends not only on the energy of bulk plasma electrons but also on the energy of beam electrons. The contribution of the beams to the particles and energy wall losses may be much larger than that of the plasma bulk electrons. Recent experimental studies may indirectly support the results of these simulations, in particular, with respect to the electron temperature saturation and the channel width effect on the thruster discharge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it