MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2043909650 · doi:10.1055/s-2004-821243

Nemaline Rods and Complex I Deficiency in Three Infants with Hypotonia, Motor Delay and Failure to Thrive

2004· article· en· W2043909650 on OpenAlexaff
Phillipa J. Lamont, David R. Thorburn, Vicki Fabian, Jiri Vajsar, Cynthia Hawkins, Ann Saada, Hayley J. Durling, Nigel G. Laing, Yoram Nevo

Bibliographic record

VenueNeuropediatrics · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies
Canadian institutionsSickKids FoundationHospital for Sick ChildrenUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Medical Research CouncilNational Health and Medical Research Council
KeywordsNemaline myopathyFailure to thriveHypotoniaMedicineMuscle HypotoniaMuscle biopsyAbnormalityCongenital myopathyBiopsyWeaknessMyopathyPediatricsPathologyAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Three infants are described who had nemaline rods on muscle biopsy and isolated deficiency of complex I of the respiratory chain on biochemical analysis. They all manifested failure to thrive from birth, and hypotonia and muscle weakness within the first three months of life. Different genetic defects leading to isolated complex I deficiency have been described associated with a variety of morphological changes on muscle biopsy, but rods have not been described. Nemaline rods have been secondary phenomena in a number of conditions, as well as being the primary abnormality in nemaline myopathy. However, the combination of nemaline rods and complex I deficiency is an association not previously reported.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.008

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.244
Teacher spread0.228 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeuropediatricsSame topicCardiomyopathy and Myosin StudiesFrench-language works237,207