Mixed Leucocyte Culture Blocking Factor Activity in the Plasma of Patients with Cancer
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Plasma samples obtained from 74 patients with malignant disease were assayed for their ability to suppress or block the mixed lymphocyte reactivity of random normal donors. 24 of the 74 patients investigated had evidence of mixed lymphocyte culture blocking factoractivity (MLC-BFA). 19 of 33 patients with disseminated disease had evidence of MLD-BFA whereas in only 5 of 41 patients with localized disease was evidence of BFA found. There was a relationship between a history of previous blood transfusion inthe 6-month period prior to study and the presence of MLC-BFA in patients' plasma. Excluding this group of patients, where previous transfusion might have been responsible for MLC-BFA and excluding, too, that group of patients with a history of past pregnancy,there remained still 11 patients with evidence of BFA in their plasma. Nine of these11 had widely disseminated and progressiv disease. MLC-BFA was found in both IgM and IgG fractions of plasma. Plasma with MLC-BFA was found to suppress normalin vitro lymphocyte responses to mitogens PWM and PHA. The MLC-BFA assay utilized in this work may provide the means of monitoring cancer patients in order to detect 'blocking' antibody.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".